Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

YF-23: The Stealth Fighter the Air Force Passed on and Japan Almost Built?

YF-23
YF-23

Summary: In 2018, Northrop Grumman almost returned to the fighter jet market with an advanced multirole combat aircraft for Japan’s Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) under the F-X program. Despite speculation that Northrop might revive its YF-23 design, which lost to the F-22 Raptor in the 1991 Advanced Tactical Fighter competition, Japan opted for domestic development.

YF-23

YF-23. Image Credit: Creative Commons

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries was selected to lead the F-3 program, aimed to replace the Mitsubishi F-2 by the mid-2030s. Northrop’s proposal, while not chosen, remains a significant “what if” in military aviation history, reflecting the potential missed opportunity of a modernized YF-23.

The YF-23 Would Never Fly

In 2018, Northrop Grumman almost became a fighter maker again as it had reportedly looked to develop an advanced multirole combat aircraft for the Japanese Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF). Some even thought Northrop could have created a new version of the YF-23 for Tokyo – but it never happened.

Japanese F-X Program

Tokyo’s F-X program began when the United States banned exports of the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor as part of the 1997 Obey amendment in order to safeguard its advanced technology, including its stealth capabilities.

As a result, Japan could not purchase the F-22 and considered producing a domestically-built fighter. At the same time, the Japanese government sent out proposals to the U.S. and UK to seek participation in the project.

As Reuters reported in 2018, “Bringing in foreign partners would allow Japan to spread development costs, estimated to be around $40 billion, and give it access to technology it would otherwise have to develop from scratch.”

A number of firms including BAE Systems, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman all responded. Boeing offered an upgrade to the JASDF’s F-15 – which, of course, may have resulted in something similar to the Boeing F-15EX that is now entering service with the U.S. Air Force. BAE Systems similarly offered an upgraded Eurofighter Typhoon, while Lockheed Martin proposed an F-22/F-35 hybrid fighter.

Northrop Grumman also expressed interest in what became the F-3 program – and it reportedly responded to the Japanese request for information (RFI), and even held preliminary talks with the Japanese defense industry.

There is speculation that the company even dusted off the specs for its YF-23. This aircraft lost the United States Air Force’s Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) competition in 1991 to the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. Quite a few articles from 2018 until the present day discuss how Japan might have gone in this direction, as the YF-23 did sport some pretty strong stealth technology. Some experts to this day still consider the YF-23 a better plane than the F-22 Raptor.

It also provided Tokyo with a “menu of technologies” that it could contribute to the F-35 fighter project.

No YF-23: Tokyo Went in Another Direction

However, it also appeared that even as Japan had wanted a foreign partner to share the cost, it also sought to ensure that domestic companies would provide the F-3’s avionics and flight hardware, which include communication and navigation systems, radar, and engines. Those were already being developed by the Japanese IHI Corp.

In October 2020, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries was selected as the lead developer of the fighter program, which is now on track to replace the Mitsubishi F-2 by the mid-2030s. The F-2, which entered service in 2000, was built jointly by Mitsubishi and Lockheed Martin. It isn’t clear how far along the F-3 currently is, but Japan also joined the British-led Future Combat Air System (FCAS) program, also known as Tempest.

There still remains speculation in what “could have been” had Northrop Grumman been given a chance to develop the F-3. Perhaps it would have been something like the YF-23, which many aviation buffs consider a missed opportunity.

About the Author: Peter Suciu

Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer. He has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,000 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes and Clearance Jobs. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.

Peter Suciu
Written By

Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer. He has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,200 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, politics, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes and Clearance Jobs. 

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Summary and Key Points: China and Russia are accelerating the development of new stealth bomber platforms, likely in response to the U.S. Air Force’s...

The Treaty

Unpacking the Capability Behind Hezbollah’s Threat to Expand its War: Less than a day after U.S. Special Envoy Amos Hochstein was in Beirut to...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Summary and Key Points: Russia’s only aircraft carrier, Admiral Kuznetsov, remains plagued by challenges despite promises of a return. -After years of repairs marked...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Fewer Ships, Recruiting Shortfalls: DEI Has Left Our Navy Less Prepared: In the past several weeks, the U.S. Coast Guard and Navy have announced...