Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

China’s New ‘Type 004’ Aircraft Carrier Summed Up in 4 Words

USS Nimitz At Sea U.S. Navy.
Two F-35C Lightning II carrier variant joint strike fighters conduct the first catapult launches aboard the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68). The F-35 Lightning II Pax River Integrated Test Force from Air Test and Evaluation Squadron (VX) 23 is conducting initial at-sea trials aboard Nimitz. (U.S. Navy photo courtesy of Lockheed Martin by Dane Wiedmann/Released)

Key Points and Summary on China’s New Type 004 Aircraft Carrier – Recent satellite imagery reveals that China is building a fourth aircraft carrier, a “supercarrier” designated Type 004, that appears larger than even the US Navy’s massive Ford-class (of course, there is debate between experts on this).

-The new warship, under construction at the Dalian shipyard, is believed to be China’s first to be nuclear-powered and will likely feature electromagnetic catapults for launching aircraft, similar to the USS Ford.

-The move signals Beijing’s immense confidence in the future of the aircraft carrier as a primary tool for global power projection and its ambition to challenge US naval supremacy, despite the growing threat of long-range anti-ship missiles.

China’s Type 004 Aircraft Carrier Explained

In the mere flash of an instant, it appears the People’s Liberation Army-Navy will soon be a four-aircraft carrier force, something which seemed like a distant thought or wish just 10 years ago.

Not only has the PLAN now had three aircraft carriers at sea at one time, but China also appears to be building a massive, first-of-its-kind “supercarrier” capable of possibly projecting more power than the US Navy’s USS Ford.

Citing commercially available satellite photos, numerous reports now indicate that China is progressing with a huge Type 004 aircraft carrier, which may be the largest the world has ever seen.

Available specifications indicate that the USS Ford can carry up to 90 aircraft, whereas China’s 004 is said to be capable of carrying at least 100.

Type 004 Carrier in 4 Words: We Don’t Know Much

Very little is known about the carrier apart from what can be observed in satellite images at the Xianglujiao drydock in Dalian, a major shipbuilding site used to build China’s first two carriers, the Liaoning and Shandong.

China’s 3rd carrier, the Fujian, is already conducting sea trials, and the PLAN has, on several occasions, conducted dual-carrier war preparation drills.

There is considerable public speculation and analysis regarding the design and configuration of the large new carrier, yet few specifics can be confirmed.

There does appear to be a consensus that the ship will be China’s first nuclear-powered carrier and operate with electromagnetic catapults.

The existence of these technologies points to what could be interpreted as the first and most self-evident observation regarding the carrier ….and that is the simple issue of being a USS Ford copycat.

The PRC has a well-documented history of copying or stealing US technologies, and it was therefore not surprising that China’s third carrier features a large, flat deck and an electromagnetic catapult similar to the USS Ford.

The PLAN’s Type 004 seems quite similar in configuration, yet larger. 

China’s View on Aircraft Carriers

Another significant element of this may be that perhaps the PLA does not think that big-deck carriers will become obsolete or simply too vulnerable in an age where modern threats such as long-range anti-ship missiles can target large platforms thousands of miles offshore.

The fact that China’s ambition to become a dominant global power capable of projecting and maintaining influence and military prowess far beyond the Pacific is well known, yet China’s apparent belief that there is still a significant and highly valued place for carriers in a modern threat environment seems quite significant.

Essentially, the emergence of this Chinese ship seems to offer a window into PRC thinking on the value and continued utility of carriers, something which has occupied a central space within Pentagon and Navy debates about the future of maritime warfare.

Chinese Ship Defenses?

Does China plan to operate the carrier in locations where there are few to no threats from long-range, shore-fired precision anti-ship missiles?

Perhaps a more likely scenario is that China is advancing with ship-defense technologies in a manner similar to the US Navy.

Can China protect carriers with lasers? EW?.. or Interceptor missiles from surrounding warships? Does China have the multi-domain ISR connecting air, surface, land and space targeting technology together in real-time, such that incoming anti-ship missiles can be seen and destroyed early in their trajectory?

It would seem likely that China is also progressing quickly with the development of layered ship defenses, as there appears to be confidence that a ship of that size could provide unique and extremely valuable advantages in war.

This view does seem to parallel the US Navy to some extent because although the US is likely to build more unmanned ships and smaller-faster, less vulnerable aircraft-carrying platforms, there does appear to be an apparent belief among US decision-makers that carriers not only provide unprecedented value in warfare … but are also hear to stay for decades into the future.

About the Author: Kris Osborn

Kris Osborn is the  President of Warrior Maven – Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a highly qualified expert in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

Kris Osborn
Written By

Kris Osborn is the President of Warrior Maven - Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – NASA’s X-43A proved an audacious idea: use a scramjet—a jet that breathes air at supersonic speeds—to fly near Mach...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – China’s J-20 “Mighty Dragon” stealth fighter has received a major upgrade that reportedly triples its radar’s detection range. -This...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – Russia’s Kirov-class (Project 1144) were nuclear-powered “battlecruisers” built to shadow and threaten NATO carriers, combining deep magazines, layered air...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – While China’s J-20, known as the “Mighty Dragon,” is its premier 5th-generation stealth fighter, a new analysis argues that...