Key Points and Summary – Fears of a secret F-35 “kill switch” are a myth, but the reality of American control is causing European allies to panic and turn away.
-The F-35 is a software-driven “flying computer” completely dependent on a U.S.-controlled lifeline of spare parts, maintenance, and critical updates.
-While there’s no remote shutdown button, the U.S. could easily hobble any allied fleet by withholding this support.
-Fueled by diplomatic tensions and trade disputes, this logistical reality has exposed the risks of dependency, forcing European partners to hedge their bets and seek greater military autonomy.
Bad News for F-35
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is often perceived as a jewel in the U.S. Air Force’s crown.
The jet is the most advanced fighter aircraft in Washington’s inventory, but that does not mean all of its partners are delighted about how it operates.
For months claims that these jets, exported to U.S. allies across the globe, have a secret “kill switch” allowing the American manufacturers to remotely disable them at will- regardless of which country they are being used by. The facts, however, tell a different story.
What is true, however, is arguably just as significant: the United States retains enormous leverage over every allied fleet of F-35s. This is not done through secret software back doors, but through logistics and maintenance.
F-35s: Flying Computers?
The F-35 is a software-driven platform. This so-called “flying computer” is composed of millions of lines of code, dependent on a steady flow of updates, spare parts, and support provided largely by the U.S. Joint Program Office and Lockheed Martin.
Without this lifeline, an ally’s F-35 squadron would quickly lose its edge. Jets could still fly, but without updates and repairs, they would be more likely to fail in combat or be picked off by enemy defenses.
This reality gives Washington a quiet but potent form of influence.
While the Pentagon flatly denies any ability to disable allied aircraft remotely, officials acknowledge the obvious: withholding support could easily hobble any partner country’s F-35 fleet.
‘Kill Switch’ Rumors
Reports of a so-called F-35 “kill switch” began to swirl after the Trump administration entered office.
Diplomatic tensions, such as Trump and V.P. J.D.Vance’s televised verbal clash with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy provoked questions over Washington’s reliability as a military ally.
At this time, there were claims that Portugal and Canada were mulling over their heavily U.S.-reliant procurement schedules.
Lockheed Martin and the Joint Program Office both slammed the speculation, claiming that their program’s strength rested upon global partnerships.
Yet concerns persist. As Stacie Pettyjohn of the Center for a New American Security told Breaking Defense, the real risk lies not in remote control, but in the denial of maintenance and networking support: “Without these software updates, F-35s could fly, but would be much more likely to be shot down.”
Europe Seeks Alternative Supply Chain
European partners are already hedging their bets and setting up regional maintenance hubs in Norway and Italy.
These sites offer spare parts depots to keep fleets operational, and offer some back-up in the event of a policy clash with Washington. Still, Europe is heavily entangled in the U.S. supply chain for now.
The latest round of testing at sea, conducted by American and Japanese forces aboard the JS Kaga, underscores the central role the aircraft has come to play in alliance planning.
Japan plans to buy 42 F-35Bs, while India has already signaled it is “not keen” on joining the club.
Ultimately, it is clear that the F-35 is both politically and technologically sound; however, many countries are starting to worry about its reliance on U.S. support.
Allies now know that when they enter this program, they are buying into a U.S.-managed ecosystem that Washington tightly controls, not merely a bunch of aircraft.
About the Author: Georgia Gilholy
Georgia Gilholy is a journalist based in the United Kingdom who has been published in Newsweek, The Times of Israel, and the Spectator. Gilholy writes about international politics, culture, and education. You can follow her on X: @llggeorgia.
More Military
China’s J-20 Fighter Is Getting Ready to Fight
