Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Dollars and Sense

Beyond Warships: The Unifying Power of the SHIPS for America Act

Zumwalt-Class U.S. Navy
(July 28, 2022) U.S. Navy Zumwalt-class guided-missile destroyer USS Michael Monsoor (DDG 1001) sails in formation during Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) 2022, July 28. Twenty-six nations, 38 ships, three submarines, more than 30 unmanned systems, approximately 170 aircraft and 25,000 personnel are participating in RIMPAC from June 29 to Aug. 4 in and around the Hawaiian Islands and Southern California. The world’s largest international maritime exercise, RIMPAC provides a unique training opportunity while fostering and sustaining cooperative relationships among participants critical to ensuring the safety of sea lanes and security on the world’s oceans. RIMPAC 2022 is the 28th exercise in the series that began in 1971. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Aleksandr Freutel)

Key Points and Summary on SHIPS for America Act – The bipartisan SHIPS for America Act is presented as more than just a legislative proposal; it’s a potential catalyst for national unity. The act aims to revitalize America’s declining shipbuilding capacity, which is a critical national security issue for deterring China and maintaining a 355-ship Navy.

-By investing in domestic manufacturing and creating thousands of blue-collar jobs and apprenticeship programs, the bill focuses on core issues with overwhelming bipartisan public support.

-At a time of deep political fracture, the act provides a common cause that could begin to stitch a divided America back together by focusing on shared values and national interests.

The SHIPS for America Act: The Bipartisan Bill Everyone Can Agree On

In the last few weeks, I’ve had the pleasure of working alongside a Pentacostalist in Mississippi, a Democrat in Alabama, a MAGA Republican in Massachusetts (yes, they exist), a shipyard executive in Oregon, an academic in New York City, a farmboy from Indiana, a retired admiral from Iowa, a veteran from Ohio, a bipartisan set of congressional and senate staffers, and one guy from Minnesota whose job I don’t fully understand.

To state the obvious, these people have wildly divergent political beliefs from one another. More than a few of them probably think that someone like me — a moderate pragmatist — is basically the washing machine of American politics: useful but boring. Yet all of these people could agree with me and with each other on one core belief.

The bipartisan SHIPS for America Act is good for America. My experience trying to build support for it has me going a step further: The SHIPS for America Act could start to stitch together a deeply fractured nation.

That seems a mammoth claim, so some background is in order. America’s lack of shipbuilding capacity is a major national security issue. As we cannot tap into economies of scale and do not have some of the best shipbuilding technologies and processes, America’s warships cost far more and take far longer to complete than they otherwise should.  Without dramatically improving domestic shipbuilding, there is no realistic path to meeting America’s goal of a 355-ship Navy. Without an adequate navy, America will struggle to deter and, if necessary, defeat China in its efforts to conquer Taiwan.

The SHIPS for America Act, then, would help us build our shipbuilding capacity that would, in turn, help us build the navy we need. It will also help our economy. It could ultimately create hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs for the blue-collar workers whom our economy otherwise leaves behind. It would create job training programs so these people do not get saddled with debt. It would bring economic growth to otherwise hard-luck regions like the Gulf Coast, the Great Lakes Region, and tough port cities like Baltimore and Philadelphia.

Yet its most fundamental value is more basic: American unity. The SHIPS for America Act (which is consciously and loudly bipartisan) leans hard into issues where the vast majority of Americans agree with each other, even across party lines.

For instance, it is critical for our military, and over 60% of both Democrats and Republicans have a favorable view of our armed forces.

It would expand job training and apprenticeship programs, which 88% of Democrats and 82% of Republicans support.

It would increase American manufacturing capacity, which 80% of Americans believe the U.S. should support.

It provides investment tax credits, which 63% of Americans support.

The bill, then, both delivers on policies Americans want to see and, just as critically, focuses Americans on the big issues where they agree.

That’s critical to the long-term viability of America itself. The only force on Earth strong enough to destroy America is America itself. America’s bloodiest war, after all, was between Americans. Our military might means no nation would dream of invading us, yet a quarter of Americans support their state seceding from the Union.

Over 60% of Republicans have a very unfavorable view of Democrats; Democrats return the favor, as 54% have a very unfavorable view of Republicans.

I refuse to believe that’s who Americans are at heart, especially when we agree on so much. We want to get along. We want to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with our countrymen. We want what’s good for America. That a Pentacostalist from Mississippi and an academic from New York could stand in lockstep proves that, for all the attention on our differences, our similarities are far greater.

The SHIPS for America Act just gives us the chance to acknowledge it.

About the Author: Neal Urwitz

Neal Urwitz served as a speechwriter for and advisor to the Secretary of the Navy from 2021-2023. He is currently a public relations executive in Washington.

Neal Urwitz
Written By

Neal Urwitz served as a speechwriter for and advisor to the Secretary of the Navy from 2021-2023. He is currently a public relations executive in Washington.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. bobb

    July 3, 2025 at 3:35 pm

    The Big Delicious War of Tomorrow, or ww3, or big great pacific war 2.0, will be chiefly or mainly fought with nuclear weapons. From the get-go.

    So, does the amazing SHIPS Act account for that scenario.

    Will the Act emphasize the pumping out of constellation-class warships by the bucketload. Or by conveyor-loads.

    If that’s so, it’s a big massive waste of money. By the way, the BBB bill has just been approved 218-214 by house. Have a happy SHIPS Act.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – NASA’s X-43A Hyper-X program was a tiny experimental aircraft built to answer a huge question: could scramjets really work...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – China’s J-20 “Mighty Dragon” stealth fighter has received a major upgrade that reportedly triples its radar’s detection range. -This...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Article Summary – The Kirov-class was born to hunt NATO carriers and shield Soviet submarines, using nuclear power, long-range missiles, and deep air-defense magazines...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – While China’s J-20, known as the “Mighty Dragon,” is its premier 5th-generation stealth fighter, a new analysis argues that...