Key Points and Summary: In a direct retaliation for US strikes on its nuclear facilities, Iran launched a barrage of at least six ballistic missiles at the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar on Monday, June 23rd.
-The base, which hosts thousands of US troops, had been evacuated in advance, and Qatari and US defenses successfully intercepted the incoming missiles, resulting in no casualties.
-Iran framed the attack as a “powerful and devastating” but proportionate response, and there are reports Tehran may have tipped off the US and Qatar beforehand.
-This calculated, symbolic act may be an attempt by Iran to save face while creating an off-ramp to de-escalate the direct military confrontation with Washington.
Iran’s Revenge Attack on Qatar Base Explained
Iran launched a retaliatory missile strike on the U.S. Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar on Monday, marking one of the most direct confrontations between Tehran and Washington in years.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) described the attack as a “powerful and devastating” operation in response to U.S. strikes over the weekend on Iran’s Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities.
Iran reportedly fired at least six missiles towards the air base, according to sources who spoke with Bloomberg.
The missiles were launched from Iran and U.S. officials confirmed that the attack was directed at the large U.S. airbase located near Doha.
There were no reported casualties as the base had already been evacuated in advance amid credible warnings of retaliation on U.S. bases close to Iran.
Qatar confirmed that all incoming missiles were successfully intercepted and that there was no structural or asset damage caused by the strikes.
The number of missiles launched in the strike is disputed. In a statement published by Tasnim, Iran’s National Security Council said that the attack included the same number of bombs that the United States used in its B-2 strikes, indicating that 14 missiles were fired at U.S. targets in the area. Tehran also claimed that the attack posed no danger to Qatar or civilians in the country, calling the strikes a proportionate response to “American aggression.”
Qatar quickly condemned the strike in an official statement and indicated that they may respond.
“We express the State of Qatar’s strong condemnation of the attack targeting the Al Udeid Air Base by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard,” Majed Al-Ansari, Qatar’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said. “Qatar reserves the right to respond directly in a manner proportionate to the nature and scale of this blatant aggression and in accordance with international law.”
Iran’s Attack: Just for Show?
The White House and Pentagon, aware that an attack was imminent, monitored the strikes from the Situation Room. President Trump had reportedly warned Iran that any retaliation would be met with ‘far greater’ force. However, the nature of Iran’s strikes – targeted at a largely empty, evacuated facility and preceded by the closure of Qatari airspace and civil shelter warnings – suggest that Iran sought to symbolically hit back at the United States without triggering a full-scale war.
Rather than prompt a fresh U.S. strike against Iran, this limited retaliation that caused no damage to U.S. assets has prompted speculation that it could be the end of any conventional warfare between U.S. and Iranian forces for the time being.
Mark Stone, U.S. correspondent for Sky News, noted that had the missiles hit the airbase or caused Americans to be killed, then President Donald Trump would have been “forced” to respond.
“If, on the other hand, either the interceptors have been successful and the missiles have not landed… or if the Iranians have fired them in such a way that they look like they’re responding, but actually, it does not involve any casualties, then that’s how, perhaps, all of this de-escalates,” Stone added.
With reports suggesting that Iran tipped off the United States and Gulf states ahead of the attack, this could well be the end of Iranian strikes on U.S. targets for now.
With Israel’s military campaign ongoing, however, it remains to be seen how the broader conflict will end, or indeed whether the United States will be compelled to launch additional strikes or take other military action.
About the Author:
Jack Buckby is a British author, counter-extremism researcher, and journalist based in New York. Reporting on the U.K., Europe, and the U.S., he works to analyze and understand left-wing and right-wing radicalization, and reports on Western governments’ approaches to the pressing issues of today. His books and research papers explore these themes and propose pragmatic solutions to our increasingly polarized society. His latest book is The Truth Teller: RFK Jr. and the Case for a Post-Partisan Presidency.
The Best Tanks on Earth
AbramsX: The Tank the US Army Wants
Pingback: Iran's Qatar 'Missile Strike' Was a 'Performative Attack' - National Security Journal