Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

The U.S. Navy’s USS Connecticut Seawolf-Class Nuclear Attack Submarine Summed Up in 4 Words

(Nov. 17, 2009) USS Connecticut (SSN 22) steams through the Pacific Ocean after participating in a 26 ship formation photo exercise. George Washington, the Navyís only permanently forward-deployed aircraft carrier participated in a photo exercise which was the culmination of ANNUALEX 21G, the largest annual bilateral exercise with the U.S. Navy and the Japan Maritime Self Defense Force. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Adam K. Thomas/RELEASED)
(Nov. 17, 2009) USS Connecticut (SSN 22) steams through the Pacific Ocean after participating in a 26 ship formation photo exercise. George Washington, the Navyís only permanently forward-deployed aircraft carrier participated in a photo exercise which was the culmination of ANNUALEX 21G, the largest annual bilateral exercise with the U.S. Navy and the Japan Maritime Self Defense Force. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Adam K. Thomas/RELEASED)

Key Points and Summary – USS Connecticut (SSN-22), one of just three elite Seawolf-class attack submarines, has been sidelined since a 2021 seamount collision in the South China Sea.

-Damage to the bow and ballast tanks triggered an Extended Docking SRA at Puget Sound, complicated by dry-dock fixes, labor shortages, and custom fabrication— including a new sonar dome funded by emergency appropriations.

Seawolf-Class Submarine

USS Connecticut (SSN 22) is docked for its Extended Docking Selected Restricted Availability July 12, 2023 at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard; Intermediate Maintenance Facility.

-A Navy probe cited preventable navigation errors and relieved the boat’s command team.

-Now slated to return in late 2026, Connecticut’s absence highlights U.S. submarine maintenance bottlenecks and a hard Indo-Pacific capability gap as Seawolf enters maintenance and Jimmy Carter remains task-limited.

USS Connecticut: The Seawolf Sub Knocked Out—And Why It Still Matters

The USS Connecticut is a Seawolf-class SSN in service with the United States Navy.

These nuclear attack submarines were initially intended to replace the older Los Angeles-class subs, but plans to procure more were cancelled after the Cold War ended. Very few Seawolf-class subs were built, making them a rare and vital asset for the Navy.

In one unfortunate case, however, the USS Connecticut collided with a seamount while maneuvering in the South China Sea. Thankfully, the incident caused no significant injuries and did not damage any vital systems. Ever since the incident, the USS Connecticut has been undergoing repairs and is expected to return to active duty in 2026.

The 2021 Seamount Collision

Commissioned in December 1998, the USS Connecticut is the second of only three Seawolf-class submarines ever constructed.

USS Connecticut Seawolf-Class Submarine

USS Connecticut Seawolf-Class Submarine. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

The Seawolf program was initially envisioned as a fleet of 29 submarines; however, the end of the Cold War and budgetary constraints led to its reduction to just three vessels: the USS Seawolf (SSN-21), the USS Connecticut (SSN-22), and the USS Jimmy Carter (SSN-23).

These submarines were designed to be faster, quieter, and more heavily armed than their predecessors, with advanced sonar systems, eight torpedo tubes, and the ability to launch Tomahawk cruise missiles and Harpoon anti-ship missiles.

Their nuclear propulsion systems enable them to operate submerged for extended periods, and their reinforced hulls allow for operations under Arctic ice.

On October 2, 2021, it collided with an uncharted underwater seamount while operating in the South China Sea. The impact caused significant damage to the submarine’s bow and forward ballast tanks and injured eleven crew members.

The vessel was able to surface and make its way to Guam for emergency repairs before eventually traveling to San Diego and then to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Bremerton, Washington, for full restoration.

The U.S. Navy attack submarine, USS Seawolf (SSN 21), conducts Bravo sea trials off the coast of Connecticut in preparation for its scheduled commissioning in July 1997. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

The U.S. Navy attack submarine, USS Seawolf (SSN 21), conducts Bravo sea trials off the coast of Connecticut in preparation for its scheduled commissioning in July 1997. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

A Navy investigation into the incident found that the collision was preventable and attributed it to failures in command and navigation. As a result, the submarine’s commanding officer, executive officer, and chief of the boat were all relieved of duty.

The USS Connecticut is Out

The repair process for the USS Connecticut has been anything but straightforward. The submarine entered Dry Dock 5 at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in early 2022, but work was delayed due to seismic vulnerabilities discovered in the drydock infrastructure.

These issues were addressed by mid-2023, allowing the Navy to proceed with what is known as an Extended Docking Selected Restricted Availability (EDSRA), a major maintenance phase that includes structural repairs and system upgrades.

The damage to the bow was particularly severe, requiring the complete replacement of the sonar dome and other forward components.

Because the Seawolf-class submarines are unique and none have been decommissioned, spare parts are not readily available.

This has necessitated custom fabrication of components, including a new bow dome, which Congress funded with an emergency allocation of $40 million, along with an additional $10 million for related repairs.

As if the damages weren’t bad enough, the labor shortages at the repair dock further exacerbated issues and pushed back Connecticut’s repair timeline.

The Navy has struggled in recent years to complete submarine maintenance on schedule, and the Connecticut’s situation is emblematic of broader issues affecting the fleet. Nearly 40 percent of the Navy’s attack submarines are currently in maintenance or awaiting repairs, a figure that has raised concerns among defense analysts and lawmakers.

The Navy has emphasized that Connecticut’s nuclear propulsion system was not affected by the collision and continues to operate as designed, which has helped streamline some aspects of the repair process.

Summed Up in 4 Words: The Navy Needs Connecticut 

Initially, the Navy projected that the Connecticut would return to active duty by the fall of 2025. However, delays in the repair process have pushed this timeline back, and the submarine is now expected to rejoin the fleet in late 2026.

The total duration of the EDSRA is estimated to be approximately 31 months, with the formal start of the repair phase scheduled for February 2023. While this timeline is more extended than initially anticipated, Navy officials have stressed the importance of ensuring that the submarine is fully restored and mission-ready before it returns to service.

The extended absence of the USS Connecticut from active duty hinders the U.S. Submarine Force.

The Navy is currently facing a gap in undersea capabilities, and the delay in the SSN(X) next-generation submarine program means that existing vessels, such as the Connecticut, must remain operational for longer than originally planned.

The Seawolf-class submarines, despite their age, remain among the most capable in the world, and their continued service is essential for maintaining U.S. dominance in undersea warfare.

The USS Connecticut is a vital asset for U.S. operations in the Indo-Pacific region. Its stealth and speed make it ideal for intelligence gathering, anti-submarine warfare, and protecting carrier strike groups.

The submarine’s ability to operate under Arctic ice also makes it valuable for missions in the polar regions.

With rising tensions in the South China Sea and the broader Pacific, the Navy is eager to return the Connecticut to service.

This urgency is heightened by the fact that the USS Seawolf is scheduled to enter its own maintenance cycle in April 2026, and the USS Jimmy Carter is heavily modified for special operations and espionage missions, limiting its availability for conventional tasks.

About the Author: Isaac Seitz 

Isaac Seitz, a Defense Columnist, graduated from Patrick Henry College’s Strategic Intelligence and National Security program. He has also studied Russian at Middlebury Language Schools and has worked as an intelligence Analyst in the private sector.

More Military

The F/A-18 Hornet Fighter Has a Message for the U.S. Navy 

F-15E Strike Eagle Has Just 1 Mission 

Russia’s Su-27 Flanker Fighter: Moscow’s Best Warplane Ever? You Decide 

Iowa-Class Battleship USS Wisconsin Has a Message for the U.S. Navy 

‘Apex Predator’: The Royal Navy’s New Astute-Class Submarine Is Quiet as ‘Baby Dolphin’

Isaac Seitz
Written By

Isaac Seitz graduated from Patrick Henry College’s Strategic Intelligence and National Security program. He has also studied Russian at Middlebury Language Schools and has worked as an intelligence Analyst in the private sector.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – NASA’s X-43A proved an audacious idea: use a scramjet—a jet that breathes air at supersonic speeds—to fly near Mach...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – China’s J-20 “Mighty Dragon” stealth fighter has received a major upgrade that reportedly triples its radar’s detection range. -This...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – Russia’s Kirov-class (Project 1144) were nuclear-powered “battlecruisers” built to shadow and threaten NATO carriers, combining deep magazines, layered air...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – While China’s J-20, known as the “Mighty Dragon,” is its premier 5th-generation stealth fighter, a new analysis argues that...