Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Typhon: The Army and Navy Have Missiles That Can Strike China or Aircraft Carriers from 1,200 Miles Away

Typhon Hypersonic Missile
Typhon Hypersonic Missile. Image Credit: YouTube Screenshot.

The U.S. Army and Navy are cooperating in the Pacific to develop new tactics and concepts of operation to support a fast-increasing number of mobile land-fired weapons systems, such as the Typhon Mid-Range-Capability (MRC) missile system. The Typhon has been sent to the Philippines and Japan. 

In development for several years, the Army’s Typhon MRC is capable of firing the Army’s emerging Precision Strike Missile, as well as land-fired variants of the Standard Missile (SM)-6 and Tomahawk. Now, the battery is also said to be capable of integrating hypersonic weapons as well, adding to its tactical and operational potential.

Tomahawk Block IV Missile

Tomahawk Block IV Missile. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Tomahawk Launch

Tomahawk Launch. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

A mobile, hypersonic-capable land-fired missile system such as the Typhon gives commanders new options to target moving ships at sea, aircraft, or land targets and integrate a new land-based, multi-domain attack system.

Moving the Typhon MRC to the Philippines brings the Army a medium-range, precision-guided land-fired cruise missile capable of hitting maritime targets from coastal positions.

More Tomahawks for Typhon in the Philippines

The Typhon is both long-range and precision-guided, and the Typhons stationed in the northern Philippines can hold ocean areas as far away as 1,200 miles at risk.

The Chinese coastline is roughly 1,800 miles from the Philippines, so the Typhon can cover two-thirds of the ocean area between the two countries with highly precise, ship-sinking ground fires.

3rd Multi-Domain Task Force (3MDTF) conducts the first Mid-Range Capability live fire exercise outside of the continental United States successfully sinking a maritime target with a Standard Missile-6 Force during Exercise Talisman Sabre 25 on July 16, 2025. US Army photo

3rd Multi-Domain Task Force (3MDTF) conducts the first Mid-Range Capability live fire exercise outside of the continental United States successfully sinking a maritime target with a Standard Missile-6 Force during Exercise Talisman Sabre 25 on July 16, 2025. US Army photo

In recent years, the Navy has introduced a Tactical Tomahawk variant able to track and destroy moving targets at sea by adjusting course in flight.

The Block IV Tomahawk can travel at speeds up to 500 miles per hour for distances up to 900 miles. It operates with a two-way datalink and a loitering capacity that allows it to adjust to targets.

It’s likely the Army could ground fire a Tactical Tomahawk to attack moving targets, as long as software or fire-control adaptations allow.

One of the most important benefits would be improved long-range strike capability.

Modern warfare increasingly emphasizes the ability to hit critical enemy infrastructure—such as command centers, radar installations, logistics hubs, and air defense systems—from long distances. Land-fired Tomahawks would allow the Army to strike these targets without relying solely on aircraft or naval forces.

This would provide commanders with greater flexibility and ensure that precision-strike capability remains available even if air bases or naval assets are limited or occupied elsewhere.

Army-Navy Synergy

Another advantage is the ability to support joint operations. The U.S. military often conducts missions through coordination among its different services.

Land-based Tomahawk units could complement missiles launched from ships or aircraft, creating multiple attack vectors that would complicate an adversary’s defenses.

When combined with naval Tomahawk launches and air-delivered weapons, land-fired systems would make it harder for enemy forces to predict where attacks will come from, increasing the likelihood that key targets could be successfully neutralized early in a conflict.

Mobility and survivability are also important factors. Modern ground-based launch systems can be mounted on mobile platforms that can relocate frequently.

This mobility makes them harder for enemy forces to detect and destroy. If dispersed across a wide area, these units could provide persistent strike capability even in contested environments where fixed bases might be vulnerable to missile or air attack.

Tomahawks Deter China

Additionally, land-fired Tomahawks could strengthen the deterrence mission in key parts of the Pacific such as the Philippines, as they place mainland China within striking reach.

This would be especially true if more land-fired Tomahawks were integrated into the Typhon or made available in additional stockpiles. Forward-deployed missile units would signal that the United States has the capability to strike critical targets quickly if necessary.

This presence could discourage potential adversaries from escalating conflicts, since they would know that important military infrastructure could be targeted from long range.

Perhaps of greatest significance, expanding land-based Tomahawk deployments could support the joint fight by reducing pressure on naval forces.

Ships carrying Tomahawk missiles are often tasked with multiple missions, including air defense, patrol operations, and escort duties.

If the Army can provide part of the long-range strike capability from land, naval forces could focus more on sea control and maritime security missions.

About the Author: Kris Osborn 

Kris Osborn is the President of Warrior Maven – Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a highly qualified expert in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

Kris Osborn
Written By

Kris Osborn is the President of Warrior Maven - Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – NASA’s X-43A Hyper-X program was a tiny experimental aircraft built to answer a huge question: could scramjets really work...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – China’s J-20 “Mighty Dragon” stealth fighter has received a major upgrade that reportedly triples its radar’s detection range. -This...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Article Summary – The Kirov-class was born to hunt NATO carriers and shield Soviet submarines, using nuclear power, long-range missiles, and deep air-defense magazines...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – While China’s J-20, known as the “Mighty Dragon,” is its premier 5th-generation stealth fighter, a new analysis argues that...