An Armistice and DMZ: The Best Idea to Keep the Peace in Ukraine and Russia—Former President Donald Trump has often said he would immediately work to end the war in Ukraine, repeatedly claiming that he could find a way to end hostilities in as little as 24 hours. He has amended that quick turnaround by saying that he would help both sides create a ceasefire before his inauguration day if he gets elected in November.
However, Trump had never offered details on what his peace plan would look like.
That all changed when running mate J.D. Vance appeared on the Shawn Ryan Show at the end of last week and gave some flesh to the bones of a peace plan. You hear it above.
What would the plan exactly look like?
Time for a Demilitarized Zone
“So, I think what this looks like is Trump sits down, he says to the Russians, the Ukrainians, the Europeans ‘You guys need to figure out what does a peaceful settlement look like?’” Vance told Ryan. “And what it probably looks like is the current line of demarcation between Russia and Ukraine, that becomes like a demilitarized zone.”
The Republican vice-presidential nominee pointed out that the demilitarized zone would be “heavily fortified so the Russians don’t invade again.”
The DMZ Is My Idea
To say I was excited to hear these words would be an understatement.
The Korea-like DMZ between Russia and Ukraine is my original idea. I have worked on my own peace proposal in Ukraine that included a DMZ for the last 18 months or so.
In December 2022, at an unpublicized event at the Heritage Foundation for journalists and European diplomats about the war in Ukraine, I brought up my idea for an armistice and a Korea-like DMZ in a group discussion. Nobody was interested, but I was undeterred.
Is Anybody Listening?
I began posting about the Ukraine DMZ idea on social media that month, and few people interacted with this content. My new book on U.S. grand strategy has many pages about my DMZ proposal, but the idea could not break through the foreign policy blob in Washington, DC.
I continued to post on X (here, here, and here) about my Ukraine peace plan that included the DMZ idea.
I Figured JD Vance Might Support It
When Vance was chosen as Trump’s running mate. I was excited because I thought he would be open to my DMZ idea. I posted on X on July 16, “My Ukraine peace plan that I lay out in my new book – an armistice and Korea-like DMZ – has just become more possible with @JDVance1 on the ticket.”
I also wrote about my DMZ idea recently in the National Security Journal.
What Does My Peace Plan Entail?
My peace plan is simple. There would be an immediate cease-fire. Both sides would back up 10 to 20 miles from the current battle lines. That land would be de-militarized like the DMZ in Korea and administered by the United Nations. The armistice would require both sides to give up territory, creating a compromise. The Ukrainians would relinquish land in the Donbas. The Russians would have to cede territory in Kursk to the Ukrainians.
The DMZ and armistice in Korea have maintained peace on the peninsula since 1953. It can succeed again in Eastern Europe.
If Trump wins, he and Vance can begin working on the DMZ peace plan immediately. Both Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky would balk at first. I admit that the DMZ idea would not be immediately popular. Putin would not want to give up land in Kursk. Zelensky would not want to cede land in the Donbas. Ukraine believes the Russians would use any ceasefire to strengthen their position at the front. Zelensky thinks his forces can win by completely ejecting the Russians from all Ukrainian territory.
Only the United States Can Make This Happen
However, the United States has leverage over Ukraine and Russia. If Trump wins, he could hold back any new military aid until Zelensky comes to the table with Russia. Trump could demand that he would support Ukraine’s admission to NATO unless the Russians agree to negotiate. The first step, a ceasefire, would thus be difficult. But once both sides cooled their emotions and began thinking through what was best for their respective countries, they would gradually warm to the DMZ idea.
The war in Ukraine has almost entered its third year, and I’m tired of the wanton slaughter. It has negatively impacted millions of people, leaving hundreds of thousands dead or wounded. There needs to be some peace plan, and aside from the DMZ idea that Vance/Trump, and I have proposed, I am not hearing any other ideas.
It is clear that this war needs to stop, and the way we get to a lasting peace is to create an armistice and a DMZ.
About the Author: Dr. Brent M. Eastwood
Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Don’t Turn Your Back On the World: a Conservative Foreign Policy and Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare, plus two other books. Brent was the founder and CEO of a tech firm that predicted world events using artificial intelligence. He served as a legislative fellow for U.S. Senator Tim Scott and advised the senator on defense and foreign policy issues. He has taught at American University, George Washington University, and George Mason University. Brent is a former U.S. Army Infantry officer. He can be followed on X @BMEastwood
JimgleBells
September 16, 2024 at 4:01 pm
Korea-style DMZ for ukraine ?Possible, but unlikely.
Recently, I had a vivid dream the ukro conflict ended with clear Russian victory.
It correctly aligns with the exit of Biden in the US presidential contest.
The ukraine conflict has Biden as its primary driver, and once he’s out, finito’s finito for the war.
Zelenskyy today can see the rest of his time as ukro leader as similar to the days of April 1945.
In mid-april ’45, the red army launched its berlin strategic offensive to clear up the mess in eastern europe.
Today, there’s a very similar type of offensive going on where forces are closing in on the fortress points in Donetsk.
The ukro units now in Kursk are like the Wehrmacht units in Pomerania in early ’45, trapped there with nowhere to go.
pagar
September 16, 2024 at 5:38 pm
Korea just isn’t now the right cup of tea for the ongoing ukraine crisis participants.
That’s because in the current ongoing crisis, russian forces have accidentally hit the right formula for dealing with the AFU.
The AFU in donbass and kharkiv regions are being whacked right and left with air-launched glide bombs, iskander missile, lancet drones and 152mm guided artillery.
(That didn’t happen or wasn’t the case in korea.)
So, if predictions are right on the money, by november 2024, the US presidential contest will coincide with the fall of the kyiv forces.
But, will the fighting end there. It’s possible some euro forces will intervene to try to save the situation, thus inadvertently pitting NATO directly against moscow.
Full-scale war on the european hi-tech battlefield then.
jeffrey delauretis
September 17, 2024 at 12:46 pm
i agree with this article. the killing needs to stop. ukraine needs to be a neutral country like austria was. not in the west or east
Kevin Shannon
September 17, 2024 at 10:58 pm
What is the leverage that the US has over Russia? Why would Russia agree to freeze the present battle lines when it believes it is winning?
Russia had agreed to freeze its conflict with Ukraine in 2013-2014 Minsk Protocols that neither Ukraine nor Germany and France, as brokers of the agreement, ever intended to honor.
If Germany wanted a ceasefire on the existing battle lines in January of 1945, would the US or the Allies have agreed to such? or with Japan? I doubt it. The Allies made clear that they wanted Unconditional Surrender when they determined that they were winning the war. When Germany wanted a ceasefire on the Western Front in 1918 it had to surrender most of its heavy weapons, pull back to German territory and consent to the continuing trade embargo imposed on it by the Western Allies. Germany was effectively neutered by these ceasefire conditions. It could not have resumed the war even it wanted to. In effect, for a cease fire Germany had agreed to an imposed peace on whatever conditions the Western Allies wanted. Would Ukraine agree to this with Russia for a ceasefire?
Pingback: America Needs a President Who Will Take on Autocrats - NationalSecurityJournal