Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Russia’s MiG-25 Foxbat Was a Mach 3 ‘Lead Sled’

MiG-25 Foxbat Fighter
MiG-25 Foxbat Fighter. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

MiG-25 Key Points and Summary – The Soviet MiG-25 “Foxbat” was a feared and mysterious super-interceptor, a “paper tiger” whose myth was shattered by the 1976 defection of pilot Viktor Belenko.

-Developed in extreme secrecy to counter the American SR-71, the West believed it to be a highly advanced and agile “super fighter.”

-However, after Belenko landed his jet in Japan, a US and Japanese analysis revealed the truth: the Foxbat was a “lead sled”—a crude, brutally powerful, high-speed interceptor built with stainless steel, but one that lacked the maneuverability and advanced avionics of its Western counterparts.

MiG-25 Was A Paper Tiger

During the 1970s, the most dreaded of all the Soviet Union’s Air Defense Forces (PVO) fighter-interceptor aircraft was the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 “Foxbat”. Due to the secrecy surrounding any information about the aircraft, it was assumed in the minds of those in the intelligence community at the time to have “magical properties.”

Therefore, when a MiG-25 aircraft landed at a Japanese airport on the island of Hokkaido and the pilot announced his intention to defect to the US, it was, as the then-Director of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), George H. W. Bush, said at the time, “an intelligence Bonanza.”

The pilot, Lt. Viktor Belenko, had been based in the Soviet Far East province of Khabarovsk. The base belonged to the Soviet-era Air Defense Forces (PVO), which were not part of the USSR Air Forces (VVS) and were a separate branch of the armed services. It was considered an elite service tasked with the mission of defending the Soviet homeland with a more important mission than the mainline Air Force (VVS).

The “intelligence bonanza” of having the aircraft in the hands of Japan, a US ally, has focused on the aircraft itself rather than the system that produced it and the pilots who flew it. Declassified documents from that time reveal not only a lengthy and contentious development path for the MiG-25 but also a system in which the pilots and their families lived that was less than optimal.

That less-than-optimal situation was what eventually led to Belenko’s defection.

Antecedents of the MiG-25

As has been written about countless times, the MiG-25 was developed not in response to any operational “wish list” from the Soviet armed forces regarding what they needed to carry out their mission. It was, according to engineers from the Mikoyan Design Bureau who worked at the bureau during the Cold War, developed in response to the technological advancements in Western aviation technology represented by the US SR-71 spy plane.

The MiG-25’s design history dates back to the 1960s, when Soviet war planners recognized the urgent need for a high-speed, high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft that could counter the advanced technology of the West. The target of Soviet designers at the time was, in particular, an aircraft that could match the North American XB-70 Valkyrie.

Mikoyan’s design team was tasked with designing an aircraft that could meet these specifications. The result was a high-thrust aircraft capable of incredible speeds beyond Mach 3, combined with an airframe composed of nickel-steel, aluminum, and titanium alloys.

Mikoyan designers who discussed the design methodology stated that this exotic combination of materials was dictated by the high temperatures generated by the aircraft flying at these high speeds.

The materials requirement was so critical that, in the process of dictating the aircraft’s requirements, non-aircraft industry entities that were developing the most advanced alloys at the time were brought into the discussion. This was to ensure that the materials needed for the airframe would meet the operational requirements.

Too Many Secrets

The development of the MiG-25 was one of the most secret programs in the history of Soviet weapons development. Information on the program was kept so hidden within the Soviet Union’s security regime that very few knew of the aircraft’s capabilities, or even of its existence.

The requirement for extreme secrecy was not just a product of the USSR’s pathological security regime. There was, as they say, a “method to the madness” of the Soviet war planners to create what today would be called a “psyop”. Western airpower analysts were convinced that the MiG-25 would be a super fighter in the same league as the US F-15.

What they did not realize was that the aircraft’s designers would focus almost entirely on the technological challenge of transitioning from a Mach 2 to a Mach 3 design, and to do so as quickly as possible. What the USSR ended up with was a very capable high-speed interceptor, but an aircraft that was heavily dependent on ground-controlled intercept (GCI) from radar stations to guide it to within visual range of the target. It was incapable of much else.

When Lt. Belenko landed on Hokkaido with his MiG-25, the US and its allies now had an unprecedented opportunity to examine the technology of one of the most secretive aircraft of the time. But what was learned during the reverse-engineering of the MiG-25 by US technicians was that the MiG-25 wasn’t a fighter-bomber.

It was not a masterful air-to-air fighter like the F-15. It was instead a high-speed, “lead sled”, as US aircraft engineers would say. It was not a threat to the US’s predominance in tactical airpower as had been presumed for years.

The limitations of the MiG-25 design did not stop the Soviets from building more than 1,200 of this type. Despite its almost “one-trick pony” performance, providing an allied nation with a “Foxbat”, the aircraft’s NATO codename was now a status symbol for the few countries that possessed them. The MiG-25 is a fascinating chapter in combat aviation history, but also an example of how much secrecy and hype can lead to the overestimation of an aircraft’s performance. An art form that Russians continue to practice even today.

About the Author: Reuben F. Johnson

Reuben F. Johnson has thirty-six years of experience analyzing and reporting on foreign weapons systems, defense technologies, and international arms export policy. Johnson is the Director of Research at the Casimir Pulaski Foundation.  He is also a survivor of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. He worked for years in the American defense industry as a foreign technology analyst and later as a consultant for the U.S. Department of Defense, the Departments of the Navy and Air Force, and the governments of the United Kingdom and Australia. In 2022-2023, he won two awards in a row for his defense reporting. He holds a bachelor’s degree from DePauw University and a master’s degree from Miami University in Ohio, specializing in Soviet and Russian studies. He lives in Warsaw.

More Military

The U.S. Navy’s Submarine Crisis Is Real

NATO’s Challenger 3 Tank Is the Unsolvable Math Problem

The B-2 Bomber Has A Fatal Flaw 

Reuben Johnson
Written By

Reuben F. Johnson has thirty-six years of experience analyzing and reporting on foreign weapons systems, defense technologies, and international arms export policy. He is also a survivor of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. He worked for years in the American defense industry as a foreign technology analyst and later as a consultant for the U.S. Department of Defense, the Departments of the Navy and Air Force, and the governments of the United Kingdom and Australia. In 2022-2023, he won two awards in a row for his defense reporting. He holds a bachelor's degree from DePauw University and a master's degree from Miami University in Ohio, specializing in Soviet and Russian studies. He lives in Warsaw.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. doyle

    July 18, 2025 at 3:55 pm

    The Soviet MiG-25 (actually initially, wrongly identified as MiG-23 by NATO) is a true superlative fighter jet of modern aviation.

    What was the original purpose or requirement that drove or led to the development of the MiG-25.

    The story goes way way back to the closing days of the fifties.

    In the late fifties, Soviet intelligence got wind of US plans to develop mach 3 military jets. The YF-12 and the XB-70.

    With the critical info having reached moscow, Soviet designers quickly went to work.

    The Mikoyan gurevich bureau (MiG) was tasked to produce a fighter capable of challenging the coming new American aircraft.

    MiG encountered numerous difficulties in developing the fighter, mostly due to the unreliable engine that was to power it.

    MiG first produced the Ye-150, followed by the Ye-152, but the troublesome new engine proved exceedingly troublesome, and so the aircraft were abandoned.

    But the threat from the Americans was ominous and dangerous and very lethal, so the bureau plodded on and developed the Ye-152A.

    The Ye-152A was similar to the earlier designs, except it was powered by twin lower-thrust engines. Engines that actually powered the MiG-21.

    Tests of the new model proved exceedingly promising, and the path to the coming MiG-25 (or MiG-23) finally became clear.

    Thus by the early sixties, the bureau produced the Ye-155, which was the Ye-152A but now powered by the R15-300 engines then having reached sufficient maturity to enable fight testing.

    In early 1964, finally, the first trustworthy prototype the Ye-155R took to the air. It was a success.

    Th soviet union began rolling out the production aircraft the MiG-23/25 and the first one flew in Sept 1964.

    In july 1967, it was publicly shown in Moscow for the first time, flying low above the city.

    The MiG-25 (or -23 according to NATO) was unmatched at the time and it was truly a product of superlative Soviet aerospace engineering that had no rival.

    The aircraft must be viewed in the tenor of its time, and the result is the Americans were left completely in the dust. Eating the dust, nothing else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – NASA’s X-43A proved an audacious idea: use a scramjet—a jet that breathes air at supersonic speeds—to fly near Mach...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – China’s J-20 “Mighty Dragon” stealth fighter has received a major upgrade that reportedly triples its radar’s detection range. -This...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – Russia’s Kirov-class (Project 1144) were nuclear-powered “battlecruisers” built to shadow and threaten NATO carriers, combining deep magazines, layered air...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – While China’s J-20, known as the “Mighty Dragon,” is its premier 5th-generation stealth fighter, a new analysis argues that...