Leopard 2 Main Battle Tank Trying to Earn Its Spurs in Ukraine: You’ve heard a common refrain from us at National Security Journal about tank warfare in Ukraine. Anti-tank missiles and attack drones have changed armored warfare making some military analysts wondering if the main battle tank is obsolete.
Much of these difficulties are due to inexperienced crews and futile tactics on the Russian side and the lack of large numbers of dismounted infantry and ammunition on the Ukrainian side.
Bring In the Leopard 2 Tank
One modern tank that was supposed to end the stalemate was the vaunted German Leopard 2 tank. This modern beast has all the goodies that you would expect. It is arguably NATO’s best tank produced by a European member. The Leopard is fast, powerful, and agile, with great armor and a respectable gun.
But how has it done in Ukraine? And what does that performance say about the overall future of the tank?
Inauspicious Start to Ukrainian Service
After much governmental wrangling, Germany finally sent Ukraine 80 Leopard 2s in early 2023. They haven’t exactly set the world on fire. Many of the tanks were damaged in battle, and at least one German lawmaker admitted that the Ukrainians were lacking spare parts and were forced to come up with their own homegrown methods to fix the tanks. This delayed maintenance periods and kept many Leopard 2s on the sidelines.
Developed During the Cold War in the 1960s
The Leopard 2 was an outgrowth of the Leopard 1, which first entered production by Krauss-Maffei in 1963. The Leopard 1 was popular on the export market, and Germany sent it to eight allied countries. The Leopard 2 was first completed in 1979 and was also a hit internationally and exported broadly.
Many Variants Have Improved the Original Model
Several variants of the Leopard 2 have evolved over the years. One of the best models, the Leopard 2 A7+, was released in 2010. The Leopard 2 A8 followed. The base models of the Leopard 2 are now in service with 23 nations.
Porsche: There Is No Substitute
One interesting historical nugget about the Leopard program is that Porsche was involved early in the process. Porsche worked on the Leopard 1 hull in 1967. By 1970, the Germans had built several different hulls to test. In the early 1970s, the Leopard 1 had a basic model 120mm smoothbore gun. In 1975, the new Leopard 2 prototype was placed in trials in the United States. The hull had better armor and a new fire control system.
Tinkering With the Gun
After getting feedback and acquiring testing data, designers opted for more firepower, and Rheinmetall installed a modern 120mm smoothbore gun (caliber length 44) with an accompanying fire control system.
The German Ministry of Defense was finally impressed with this iteration of the Leopard 2, and it ordered 1,800 of the main battle tanks in 1977. Then the guns were upgraded again hoping for a weapon that would overawe the Soviets during the Cold War.
Fighting-Vehicles.com described this gun program with enthusiasm. “The increased caliber length of the barrel meant the armor piercing round had further to travel when fired, which allowed the energy of the combustible charge to build up behind it for longer, which pushed it out faster and resulted in greater accuracy, range and ‘punch’ when it hit the enemy tank.”
Modern Specs Emerge
After 2010, subcontractors focused on improving the modern Leopard 2’s armor. In 2016, Rheinmetall introduced the new modular Hard-Kill Active Protection System. In 2021, several subcontractors led by Rafael formed an effort to install the Trophy Active Protection System on the Leopard 2.
Leopard 2s travel with a diesel engine that puts out 1,500 horsepower. Top speed is 44 miles per hour on roads.
By 2023, the Leopard 2 was up to its eighth iteration. You have to give the Germans credit for spending such a significant amount of time, money, and resources to upgrade this platform so much. Many German companies had a hand in production and have made this one of the best tanks in the world. It is so advanced that the Ukrainians have endured some difficulty repairing and maintaining it, but the German government made the right choice to send it to fight the Russian invaders. We will continue to track the Leopard 2 to see how it performs on the battlefield in Ukraine and if NATO partners keep ordering it in numbers.
About the Author: Dr. Brent M. Eastwood
Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Don’t Turn Your Back On the World: a Conservative Foreign Policy and Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare, plus two other books. Brent was the founder and CEO of a tech firm that predicted world events using artificial intelligence. He served as a legislative fellow for U.S. Senator Tim Scott and advised the senator on defense and foreign policy issues. He has taught at American University, George Washington University, and George Mason University. Brent is a former U.S. Army Infantry officer. He can be followed on X @BMEastwood.
Pingback: T-14 Armata vs. M1 Abrams: How These Tanks Could Clash in Ukraine - NationalSecurityJournal
Pingback: News Briefs – 09/26/2024 | Anonymous Conservative
ClickBaitSucker
September 26, 2024 at 9:53 am
WTF is this story supposed to be about? Anything related to its headline????????
James D Johnson
September 26, 2024 at 10:42 am
By its title, the editors misrepresented this article as a performance review of the Leopard 2 in combat in Ukraine. That is not what it is.
This article a brief history of the development of the the Leopard tank only.
choochmont
September 26, 2024 at 9:52 pm
This “doctor’s” stories are always pretty lame, written like a public school 9th grader.
larry
September 26, 2024 at 10:03 pm
I got to the end and the story never happened
Pingback: The New Challenger 3 Tank Could Soon Be NATO's Best - NationalSecurityJournal