Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Iran Destroyed 42 U.S. Military Aircraft in Operation Epic Fury: Lessons Must Be Learned

Exercise Artemis Strike is a German-led tactical live fire exercise with live Patriot and Stinger missiles at the NATO Missile Firing Installation in Chania, Greece from Oct. 31-Nov. 09. Over 200 U.S. soldiers and approximately 650 German airmen will be participating in the realistic training within a combined construct, exercise the rigors associated with force projection and educate operators on their air missile defense systems. The 10th Army Air Missile Defense Command will deploy, operate and fire live missiles within a tactical scenario, under Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe operational readiness evaluation criteria.
Exercise Artemis Strike is a German-led tactical live fire exercise with live Patriot and Stinger missiles at the NATO Missile Firing Installation in Chania, Greece from Oct. 31-Nov. 09. Over 200 U.S. soldiers and approximately 650 German airmen will be participating in the realistic training within a combined construct, exercise the rigors associated with force projection and educate operators on their air missile defense systems. The 10th Army Air Missile Defense Command will deploy, operate and fire live missiles within a tactical scenario, under Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe operational readiness evaluation criteria.

In the rubble of key infrastructure losses to the U.S. military in the Middle East as a result of Iranian retaliation in Operation Epic Fury, there are lessons to learn for all forces forward. America must invest more heavily in acquiring air and missile defense capabilities, a suite of layered, varied counter-drone kits, and begin a major construction effort to put key assets and equipment underground, including overseas.

Operation Epic Fury: We Must Learn and Adapt 

A Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptor is launched from the Pacific Spaceport Complex Alaska in Kodiak, Alaska, during Flight Experiment THAAD (FET)-01 on July 30, 2017 (EDT). During the test, the THAAD weapon system successfully intercepted an air-launched, medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) target.

A Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptor is launched from the Pacific Spaceport Complex Alaska in Kodiak, Alaska, during Flight Experiment THAAD (FET)-01 on July 30, 2017 (EDT). During the test, the THAAD weapon system successfully intercepted an air-launched, medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) target.

The days of exposed aircraft sitting safely on runways to prosecute operations unimpeded are over. But not nearly enough U.S. military bases at home or abroad are hardened or sheltered to protect our most capable equipment.

In a stunning security breach that went largely unanswered, unidentified drones swarmed above the skies of America’s bomber base in Louisiana for days in March. Barksdale Air Force Base is home to B-52 bombers and nuclear weapons storage facilities, and command and control assets. According to ABC News, the drones arrived in organized waves of 12 to 15 at a time for hours each day for a week. This threat caused troops to shelter in place and the flight line to shut down.

The drone blitzes over Barksdale were operating “with aircraft displaying non-commercial signal characteristics, long-range control links and resistance to jamming.” These same drones “used varied routes of ingress and deliberate maneuvering within restricted airspace.” An internal government briefing apparently found the drones “appeared to be custom-built and required ‘advanced knowledge’ of signal operations.”

The drones should have been neutralized on the first day of unauthorized intrusion, and the bombers should have been safely protected underneath a hardened hangar. Instead, the drones collected intelligence—including testing security responses—for nearly a week using “varied routes of ingress and deliberate maneuvering within restricted airspace” and “dispersed across sensitive locations on the base.”

This type of activity is only going to increase at home and abroad and will increasingly employ kinetic actions to achieve military effects.

A recent RAND report found the People’s Republic of China “made major investments in the quality and quantity of its missile forces between 2017 and 2024 … that could threaten [U.S.] air bases” in the region. Unfortunately, Iran has given the CCP a handy playbook. ‘

China J-20 Fighter X Screenshot

China J-20 Fighter X Screenshot.

What the Iran War Could Teach About a China War 

As a preview of what China could do to American bases and equipment, look no further than the Middle East. In the opening weeks of Epic Fury, the IRGC destroyed dozens of American aircraft—some of which are no longer in production. A congressional research service report lists the aircraft combat losses from Epic Fury through early April 2026, including:

-4 F-15E Strike Eagle fighter aircraft

-1 F-35A Lightning II fighter aircraft

-1 A-10 Thunderbolt II ground-attack aircraft

-7 KC-135 Stratotanker aerial refueling aircraft

-1 E-3 Sentry airborne early warning-and-control system aircraft (AWACS)

-2 MC-130J Commando II special operations aircraft

-1 HH-60W Jolly Green II combat search-and-rescue helicopter

-24 MQ-9 Reaper medium-altitude long-endurance drone aircraft

-1 MQ-4C Triton high-altitude long-endurance uncrewed aircraft

America’s military equipment and base exposure stands in stark contrast to Iran’s effective subterranean warfare. After unrelenting bombardment using some of America’s biggest and heaviest bombs, the intelligence community reportedly assesses that 90% of Iran’s underground missile storage and launch facilities are still active. Iran possesses hardened underground “missile cities” to compensate for a lack of air superiority. These buried bases are holding up too well under withering attacks, providing space and time for Iran to repair damaged munitions.

While the Pentagon recently announced 5 domestic military bases will join an anti-drone pilot program, the government is way behind the threat. A recent bipartisan effort to harness battlefield lessons from Ukraine on drone warfare by Senators McConnell and Bennet cannot go fast enough.

T-84 Tank from Ukraine War

T-84 Tank from Ukraine War. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

While the billions provided for acquiring low-cost counter-drone systems is essential, more funds must be spent to place America’s “high-value, hard-to-replace, and time-critical assets”—such as munitions, fuel distribution, command and control continuity nodes, and spares—out of harm’s way and “sheltered, underground or in space.”

According to Steve Blank at Stanford, the Earth’s surface is contested space, and “undefended high value fixed civilian infrastructure” is all at great risk. More simply: “the long-term math no longer favors the defender.” Placing more military assets underground can “preserve forces and enable maneuver.”

America’s armed forces must catch up to rapidly changing threats and do a better job protecting bases and equipment at home and overseas. More counter-drone, missile defenses, and subterranean protection are needed as soon as possible.

About the Author: Mackenzie Eaglen 

Mackenzie Eaglen is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where she works on defense strategy, defense budgets, and military readiness. She is also a regular guest lecturer at universities, a member of the board of advisers of the Alexander Hamilton Society, and a member of the steering committee of the Leadership Council for Women in National Security.

Mackenzie Eaglen
Written By

Mackenzie Eaglen is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where she works on defense strategy, defense budgets, and military readiness. She is also a regular guest lecturer at universities, a member of the board of advisers of the Alexander Hamilton Society, and a member of the steering committee of the Leadership Council for Women in National Security. Ms. Eaglen is also one of the 12-member US Army War College Board of Visitors, which offers advice about academic program objectives and effectiveness, and serves on the US Army Science Board, an advisory body that provides guidance on scientific and other matters to the Army’s senior leadership. In 2023, she became a member of the Commission on the Future of the Navy, established by Congress to study the strategy, budget, and policy concerning the future strength of the US Navy fleet.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – NASA’s X-43A Hyper-X program was a tiny experimental aircraft built to answer a huge question: could scramjets really work...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – China’s J-20 “Mighty Dragon” stealth fighter has received a major upgrade that reportedly triples its radar’s detection range. -This...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Article Summary – The Kirov-class was born to hunt NATO carriers and shield Soviet submarines, using nuclear power, long-range missiles, and deep air-defense magazines...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – While China’s J-20, known as the “Mighty Dragon,” is its premier 5th-generation stealth fighter, a new analysis argues that...