Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

A Historic Showdown: Why Putin and Trump are Meeting in Alaska

Donald Trump
President Donald Trump plays golf in the Senior Club Championship at Trump National Golf Club Jupiter, Sunday, April 6, 2025, in Jupiter, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

PUBLISHED on August 13, 2025, 12:40 PM EDT – United States President Donald J. Trump’s Alaska meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin has one purpose: to see if Putin is serious about a ceasefire.

Despite multiple trips to Moscow by highly-trusted Ambassador Steve Witkoff, Trump’s longtime associate and friend, the American president wants to look Putin in the eye. Trump says, “Probably in the first two minutes, I’ll know whether a deal can be made.”

The Intricate Art of the Deal

Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy doubts Putin is sincere. “So far, there is no indication whatsoever that the Russians have received signals to prepare for a post-war situation. On the contrary, they are redeploying their troops and forces in ways that suggest preparations for new offensive operations,” he wrote on X on Aug. 11.

Inviting Putin to Alaska is the right call. Old-fashioned diplomacy demanded that every detail be aligned in advance, down to the color of the flower arrangements. Trump plays it differently. For this New York real estate magnate, multiple meetings to hammer out deals are the norm.

Alaska is both a convenient and significant location, not least because of the International Criminal Court arrest warrant issued for Putin due to the abduction of children from Ukraine. If Putin touched down in Paris, he’d be handcuffed. The Great Circle Route from Moscow to Alaska cuts straight across the Arctic without Putin’s plane entering European airspace. An Alaska summit also shows off American military power at its best.

F-22s, F-35s, the Ground-based missile defense interceptors, Joint Base Elmendorf: all reiterate America’s Pacific reach and Arctic presence. After all, “Alaska is the most strategic place on earth,” stated Brig. Gen. Billy Mitchell in testimony before Congress in 1935.

Even if the Alaska meeting brings a ceasefire closer, it will not remove the military threat of Putin’s resurgent Russia. “Russia will undoubtedly in my mind remain a threat,” NATO’s new Supreme Allied Commander Alexus Grynkewich said recently.

Wartime Casualties

Putin goes to Alaska as a leader who failed at war and has cost Russia close to one million casualties in four years of war.

Ukraine, by any measure, is the winner of this brutal conflict. Russian tanks closed to within less than 20 miles of Kyiv before being stopped and destroyed at Bucha. Ukraine’s forces then cleared Russians out of the northern invasion zones, liberated Kharkiv, and have since denied Russia full control of prizes such as Donetsk, including territory Russia briefly held in 2014. Ukraine still holds the key city hub of Kramatorsk, for example.

Yet out of the ashes of the Ukraine war, Russia has arisen as a military threat to NATO and an agent provocateur encouraged by Xi Jinping’s China. Putin’s Russia has “refashioned its military, economic, and social structures to sustain what it describes as a long-term confrontation with the West,” noted outgoing SACEUR Gen. Christopher Cavoli. Russia’s defense spending is nearly 40% of all government spending, the highest since the end of the Cold War, and Russia is on track to replace all the equipment lost in Ukraine.

Russia Advances Goals, Despite Summit Talks

Russia’s partnership with China has advanced to joint bomber patrols and naval exercises carried out in August in the Sea of Japan. In 2024, Russia tested its new intermediate-range Oreshnik missile against a Ukrainian target. Co-production of Iranian-designed Shahed drones continues.

Even if peace comes in Ukraine, Grynkewich said Russian capabilities will reconstitute. Earlier this year, a Danish intelligence study estimated Putin could attack in Moldova in under six months and be ready for an assault on one of the Baltic states in two years. NATO’s new war plans have refocused on combined arms operations. “Deterrence is most challenging in the land domain,” according to SACEUR. Any Russian attack against Europe would “likely begin with a comparatively large Russian force positioned on a NATO border in order to negate traditional US and NATO advantages in, and preferences for, long-range, standoff warfare. The Operation Steadfast Defender exercises in 2024 marshalled 90,000 forces from all 32 partners for the biggest exercise since 1988.

“We have got to build capabilities at mass,” concluded Grynkewich.

This threat is why NATO has sprinted to coordinate over $1 billion in purchases of US equipment for Ukraine just as of early August. Germany is sending two more Patriot batteries, and several other nations have aid and military assistance en route.

“The challenge is taking that commitment and turning it into real capability and capacity on the battlefield,” Grynkewich warned. “We have a shopping list,” he added. “We need real capabilities delivered as soon as possible.”

US and NATO Bracing

Top of the list is the M1 Abrams tank, a favorite of Trump, which remains the key chess piece along NATO’s eastern front.

That front now pivots on Poland. The Suwalki corridor on the border of Poland and Lithuania proves the point. The corridor connects to Kaliningrad, a map accident from 1945 exploited by Stalin and turned into a Russian settlement enclave. Now, Kaliningrad bristles with top-line Russian air defenses.

Holding this area requires tank defenses and airpower to prevent a quick Russian move similar to the 2022 attack on Kyiv. While Ukraine had maneuvering space to turn back that onslaught, the Suwalki corridor could be choked off fast unless forces are in place. The Army’s newest M1E3 version is lighter and modified to incorporate lessons from Ukraine, including advanced sensors, autonomy, and modular armor protection against drones. “We are going have armor on the modern battlefield,” Army Chief of Staff General Randy George said in a recent podcast interview, and George is speeding up delivery of new Abrams tanks. Tanks and airpower must be in place to deter.

Holding off Russia will also require extensive air defenses. Putin’s primary form of escalation of late has been unleashing his vast arsenal of missiles and drones. Patriot air defense batteries have shot down Russian Kinzhal Kh47M2 hypersonic missiles. They are so popular that Norway and Sweden are chipping in to pay for Romania’s new Patriots, and President Volodymyr Zelensky asked to buy 10 Patriot batteries for Ukraine. The problem is that Patriot batteries are scarce. The Netherlands gave theirs to Ukraine, and that NATO ally is still awaiting backfill. Remember the two US Patriot batteries that launched “a bunch” of hit-to-kill interceptors to defend Al Udeid Air Base against Iran’s attacks were actually pulled from their normal locations in Japan and South Korea, according to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Daniel Caine.

What Will Happen In Alaska? 

The Alaska meeting will set the agenda for US-Russia relations for quite some time to come. Russia has the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, and the new START agreement extension expires in February 2026.

Alaska will also be an initial data point on whether there is any hope left for nuclear arms control.

About the Author: Dr. Rebecca Grant, Lexington Institute 

Dr. Rebecca Grant, a Vice President at the Lexington Institute,  is a national security analyst based in Washington, DC specializing in defense and aerospace research and national security consulting. She has over 20 years experience working with the United States Air Force, United States Navy, and top aerospace clients. In addition, Dr. Grant has often appeared on television as an expert on national security for Fox News, Fox Business, CNN, and MSNBC and as a series regular on The Smithsonian’s Air Warriors. Dr. Grant also writes on China, Russia and other technology and national security topics for Fox News Opinion.  Her military books include 75 Great Airmen (with Lt. Gen. Chris Miller), The B-2 Goes to War, and Battle-Tested: Aircraft Carriers in Afghanistan and Iraq. Dr. Grant graduated from Wellesley College and earned a PhD in International Relations from the London School of Economics, University of London. You can follow her on X: @Rebeccagrantdc.

Rebecca Grant
Written By

Dr. Rebecca Grant, a Vice President at the Lexington Institute,  is a national security analyst based in Washington, DC specializing in defense and aerospace research and national security consulting. She has over 20 years experience working with the United States Air Force, United States Navy, and top aerospace clients. In addition, Dr. Grant has often appeared on television as an expert on national security for Fox News, Fox Business, CNN, and MSNBC and as a series regular on The Smithsonian’s Air Warriors. Dr. Grant also writes on China, Russia and other technology and national security topics for Fox News Opinion.  Her military books include 75 Great Airmen (with Lt. Gen. Chris Miller), The B-2 Goes to War, and Battle-Tested: Aircraft Carriers in Afghanistan and Iraq. Dr. Grant graduated from Wellesley College and earned a PhD in International Relations from the London School of Economics, University of London. 

4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. bish-bish

    August 13, 2025 at 1:15 pm

    Would joe Biden ever have this kind of summit. Nope, he wouldn’t. Biden was a crazed disruptor, a maddened warmonger and a wokeist-fascist american democrat.

    At thus coming summit, trump can”t become the combo of being the judge and jury.

    He just needs to know the latest developments on the ground straight out from the horse mouth.

    Can opposing forces be allowed to mingle with each other, watching eyeball to eyeball and staring at each other’s physical appearance.

    The answer straight out from the horse mouth. No.

    The nazi forces must totally withdraw from Donbass. No sticking around. Now. Today.

  2. taco

    August 13, 2025 at 1:59 pm

    In 2022, Putin only wanted freedom for luhansk and Donetsk. (Check the news articles of the period.)

    But genocide joe couldn’t even agree to it. Neither could jens stoltenberg and the western media and the euro politicians and their cronies.

    Now in 2025, Putin no longer wants just luhansk and Donetsk.

    Putin now wants the entire Donbass region, including the other two regions of Kherson and zaporizhzhia.

    As such, the coming alaska meeting will lead to the answer or revelation of whether trump can achieve what Biden couldn’t do at all. Surrender the whole of Donbass instead of just two small regions.

    Once that has been achieved or agreed upon, trump next must force zelenskyy to come to terms with this loss.

    Otherwise, zelenskyy has the option of losing even more regions. Like dnipropetrovsk. And Sumy.

  3. Commentar

    August 13, 2025 at 2:36 pm

    Latest news reports by western media say russia is preparing to test a new missile in the barents sea. This weekend.

    The rumors is the missile is the burevestnik.

    What’s the burevestnik.

    It is a low-flying missile with unlimited range. And carries a thermonuclear warhead. Sort of a nuke kamikaze missile. The west currently has no equivalent.

    If you get hit, you go boom.

    If you hit it, you go boom as well. Nasty proposition.

  4. bish-bish

    August 13, 2025 at 5:04 pm

    Topic number One in alaska on friday aug 15 2025.

    Topic: PERMANENT PEACE

    To secure permanent peace in europe for the next 500 years, the nazis must be obliterated.

    If the nazis are allowed to stick around, then russia must straightaway develop and deploy space-based nukes.

    Russia should also develop burevestnik missiles armed with a conventional warhead but still using reactor-power.

    When that has been achieved, russia can test them live on the nazis, like what IDF is doing to gaza today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – NASA’s X-43A Hyper-X program was a tiny experimental aircraft built to answer a huge question: could scramjets really work...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – China’s J-20 “Mighty Dragon” stealth fighter has received a major upgrade that reportedly triples its radar’s detection range. -This...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Article Summary – The Kirov-class was born to hunt NATO carriers and shield Soviet submarines, using nuclear power, long-range missiles, and deep air-defense magazines...

Military Hardware: Tanks, Bombers, Submarines and More

Key Points and Summary – While China’s J-20, known as the “Mighty Dragon,” is its premier 5th-generation stealth fighter, a new analysis argues that...