There is one tank you should keep an eye on, and it could be the best in Europe. I am referring to the new upgraded Challenger 3 tank unveiled last month that will enter the British Army arsenal. There is quite a buzz surrounding this main battle tank. Defense heavyweight Rheinmetall believes the Challenger 3, with its updated armor and 120mm smoothbore cannon, is the most sophisticated armored vehicle in NATO.
The Challenger 3 will join Ajax and Boxer infantry fighting vehicles to form the nerve center of the new Future Soldier concept for the British Army. This will improve the U.K.’s land warfare efforts into the 2030s.
Challenger 3: Big Contract for the Upgrade
Rheinmetall and BAE Systems received a $1 billion contract to upgrade 148 Challenger 2 tanks to the new Challenger 3 edition. Two Challenger 3 prototypes are already being tested, and six should be completed before the end of the year.
It’s All About the New Cannon
The British Army had been using the Challenger 2 tanks, which have a rifled gun barrel. The new smoothbore model will significantly upgrade the Challenger 3’s firepower. It uses the same 120mm smoothbore that the Leopard and M1 Abrams tanks use.
Protect, Protect, and Protect Some More
The Challenger 3 will also have a new “modular armor system” for better survivability. Engineers at the defense contractors were quite aware of how many tanks were destroyed or damaged during the war in Ukraine, and this armor was made to defend against anti-tank missiles and drones. The Challenger 3 will also have the advanced Trophy active protection system, which has better defenses against enemy fires and swarming suicide drones.
Other Improvements Make This Edition Special
The upgraded tank weighs 66 tons. It has a crew of four and better fire control with 24-hour all-weather sights. The engine has been improved, along with a hydro-gas suspension, enhanced communications ability, and increased electrical power.
Up to NATO Standards
This comes as the Challenger 2 was growing long in the tooth. This older model has been in service since 1998. The main concern was updating the gun to the 120mm smoothbore edition that puts it into the same class of main battle tanks from Germany and the United States. This will make it compatible with NATO ammunition.
UK Defense Secretary Grant Shapps said, “In a more dangerous world, the need for vehicles such as the Challenger 3 is imperative as the threats facing the UK evolve. This tank will be at the heart of the British Army’s warfighting capabilities and will be integral to the UK’s deterrence.”
This Can Only Improve the Struggling British Army
The Challenger 3 will be a shot in the arm to the British Army, which has seen its numbers go down. One could also argue its relevance has been suffering. The army is the least modernized of all the UK’s military branches. The army has been hit by budget cuts at a time when the world has become more dangerous. Conflicts in the Ukraine and in the Middle East have made some reconsider the army’s role in the modern global threat environment. Some have questioned if this “hollowed out” army can dominate the enemy.
Tanks Are Still Needed
This means that the Challenger 3 will have to lead the charge in combined arms mechanized warfare. Some have deemed the main battle tank obsolete in Ukraine, but land forces still must have armored vehicles to support dismounted infantry to take and hold ground. The war in Ukraine has shown that a hostile great power will do anything to swallow more territory, and the tank is a significant tool in defense mode and for counter-attacking.
The Challenger 3 upgrades show that the British Army is ready to get into the game if the Russians ever attack NATO and the Article 5 mutual defense clause is triggered. British tank crews will need to be in top form, and having a Challenger 3 in the mix will increase the lethality and firepower of the future force.
About the Author
Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Don’t Turn Your Back On the World: a Conservative Foreign Policy and Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare, plus two other books. Brent was the founder and CEO of a tech firm that predicted world events using artificial intelligence. He served as a legislative fellow for U.S. Senator Tim Scott and advised the senator on defense and foreign policy issues. He has taught at American University, George Washington University, and George Mason University. Brent is a former U.S. Army Infantry officer. He can be followed on X @BMEastwood.

Jacksonian Libertarian
October 4, 2024 at 8:13 am
“Drones own the battlefield”
How many $1,000 HEAT grenade-armed drone attacks can this $10,000,000 Tank survive?
Tanks are obsolete Industrial Age dumb weapons, whose combat power on the Information Age smart weapon battlefield is in steep decline.
The only reason Industrial Age dumb weapons are still in use on the battlefield is because you fight a war with the military you have, and not the military you wish you had.
There is a lot of “Sunk Costs Fallacy” and “Generals always preparing to fight the last war” going on as well.
Ukraine will produce and use over 1,000,000 drones this year 2024.
404NotFound
October 4, 2024 at 9:31 am
The new brit tank is just a big laugh.
Why. Exact same design as latest tanks all descended from FT tank of ww1.
Like putting lipstick on a sow. Still a sow despite it.
There’s now the spanking new hyundai rotem next-gen tank which is definitely better than this challenger 3.
Also the really new german ARC tank which has a 3-man crew and an unmanned turret.
Challenger 3 ? Pfft.
pagar
October 6, 2024 at 9:17 am
Tanks like this challenger 3 are strictly for those generals who dream of (thoroughly) thrashing a defeated adversary after his defenses in the air and on the sea have been fully broken & obliterated by missiles, bombs and shells.
That opinion or belief was once expressed by none other than major-gen Richard ross coffman of US Army Futures Command.
Coffman’s idea was the defeated enemy or adversary must be thoroughly trounced and then finished off by a tank onslaught using heavy monstrous MBTs even though his back (main Military force) is already broken.
Bear in mind just very very recently the USAF just given an extra $73 million to raytheon to ‘enhance’ production of its HACM weapin.
The HACM is thought to be powered by a futuristic scramjet engine.
Pingback: The New Challenger 3 Tank Has a Numbers Problem That Needs Solving - National Security Journal
Pingback: The Air Force Should Worry: China Wants 1,000 J-20 Mighty Dragon Stealth Fighters - National Security Journal
Pingback: The Saab 37 Viggen Fighter Was Built for War with Russia - National Security Journal
Pingback: Mach 6 SR-72 Darkstar Has a Message for Russia or China's Military - National Security Journal
Pingback: The Merkava Tank Might Be the Best on Earth (Not Made in USA) - National Security Journal
Pingback: China's J-35A Stealth Fighter Was Built to Battle the U.S. Air Force - National Security Journal
Pingback: Russia's MiG-23 Flogger Fighter 'Flies Like a Bullet, and Turns Like One' - National Security Journal
Pingback: The U.S. Military Is Falling Behind in a 'China Arms Race' That May Not Exist - National Security Journal
Pingback: China Is Building A Massive Fleet of J-20 Stealth Fighters - National Security Journal
Pingback: The U.S. Air Force's Big B-1B Lancer Bomber Mistake - National Security Journal
Pingback: The Ukraine War Means All Future Wars Will Be Drone Wars - National Security Journal
Pingback: Yes, Trump Could Quit NATO - National Security Journal
Pingback: Putin 'Could' Start a Nuclear War over Ukraine - National Security Journal
Pingback: Why Is U.S. Military Recruitment Up So Much Now? - National Security Journal
Pingback: The Walls Are Closing on the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carriers - National Security Journal
Pingback: The Walls are Closing in on the 'New' B-52J Air Force Bomber - National Security Journal
Pingback: The U.S. Navy Is Desperate for More Nuclear Attack Submarines - National Security Journal
Pingback: The P-61 Black Widow Might Be the Best World War II Fighter - National Security Journal
Pingback: The US Navy Almost Built 'Medium' Aircraft Carriers - National Security Journal
Pingback: Glock: The Gun Every Military Loves - National Security Journal
Pingback: AOC for President? One Big Time Democrat Could Back Her in 2028 - National Security Journal
Pingback: China Fears the Air Force's B-52 Bomber - National Security Journal
Pingback: 'Putin Thinks He Is Winning': Russia Doesn't Want Any Ceasefire in Ukraine War - National Security Journal
Pingback: Putin Has a New Problem in Ukraine: Russia's T-90 Tank Has a 'Disco Head' Glitch - National Security Journal
Pingback: Ukrainian Sniper, 58, Sets New World Record with 2.36-Mile Kill Shot - National Security Journal
Pingback: Putin Faces a New Ukraine War Problem - National Security Journal
Pingback: Taiwan: The Spark That Could Start a U.S.-China World War III - National Security Journal
Pingback: Ukraine's War Strategy Against Russia Could Change Dramatically - National Security Journal
Pingback: Blame Trump: One Of America's Closest Allies Could Cancel F-35 Fighter - National Security Journal
Pingback: F-89 Scorpion: The Nuclear-Armed Jet Fighter That Fell Apart Mid-Air - National Security Journal
Pingback: Trump's 'Debt Bomb Plan' to Crash the U.S. Economy - National Security Journal
Pingback: Forget Peace: Ukraine Thinks Putin Is Getting a New Offensive Ready - National Security Journal
Pingback: NATO Challenger 3 Tank Has 'Numbers' Problem That Won't Be Easy to Fix - National Security Journal
Pingback: Trump Is In Trouble: Some in GOP Won't Agree to Big Beautiful Bill - National Security Journal
Pingback: Ukraine Has a 'Secret Back Door' Into NATO - National Security Journal
Pingback: Moscow Is 'Under Attack' as Ukraine Launches New Drone Strikes - National Security Journal
Pingback: Russia Blasts Ukraine With 'Brutal Onslaught' Drone Swarm Attack - National Security Journal
Pingback: Ukraine War Update: Kyiv and Odesa Suffer Overnight Missile Onslaught - National Security Journal
Pingback: NATO's Challenger 3 Tank Is a Powerhouse on the Battlefield - National Security Journal
Pingback: China's J-20 Stealth Fighter Explained in 3 Words - National Security Journal
Pingback: Why China's J-20 Mighty Dragon Has No Cannon to 'Dogfight' - National Security Journal
Pingback: Yamato-Class: 72,000 Tons of Raw Battleship Power (The Biggest Ever) - National Security Journal
Pingback: The F-15N 'Sea Eagle' Fighter Could Have Been a 'Game Changer' for the Navy - National Security Journal
Pingback: Barrett M82A1: The Most Powerful Military Rifle on Planet Earth - National Security Journal